Given the latest UN SDG report, warning that no Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are on track for achievement within the preestablished time frame, a new study by impak Analytics offers a timely and insightful look at the situation on the ground, and the challenges ahead.

Titled “Mission 2030: A False Start?“, the study looks at whether or not companies are truly living up to their self-reported commitments found in corporate sustainability reports. It does that by analyzing the STOXX 600 index—a compilation of the 600 largest listed companies in 17 of the most developed countries in Europe.

What the researchers found is concerning. “This analysis reveals a massive gap between European companies’ sustainability rhetoric and their actual positive impact on the SDGs,” shares Marion Bitoune, Senior Impact Analyst and SDG Expert. “We found revenues aligned with social and environmental goals to be strikingly low.”


  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • StumbleUpon

Senior Impact Analyst & SDG Expert, Marion Bitoune, is concerned about the study’s findings


The index’s diversified industry allocations (Industrials – 23% of allocations, Financials – 18%, Consumer Discretionary – 13%) provide insights into critical global issues. These range from the highest emitting sectors, such as iron and steel, and chemicals, to human rights violations lurking in our clothes’ supply chains, to the unethical business practices to which our banks are exposed. The study leveraged public data and their proprietary analysis tool —the impak SDG Alignment (iSA)— which employs a double materiality assessment to measure a company’s positive and negative contributions to the SDGs by analyzing its products, services, practices, and policies within its operations and supply chain.

impak Analytics evaluates SDG positive contributions by calculating percentages of activities of a company, representing estimated revenues from products or services, contributing to an SDG (e.g. renewable energy generation for SDG 7). Depending on the company sector, revenues may come from assets, investments, or sales.

The research found that 4% of the total STOXX 600’s combined revenue has a positive contribution to the SDGs. In reality, only 15% of the STOXX 600 companies generate one or more positive contributions; and, on average, only 29% of their combined revenues align with the SDGs. The rest? Either neutral or a negative contribution (see below).

Furthermore, analyzing the SDG distribution reveals interesting trends. Companies focus their positive contribution more on certain goals like affordable and clean energy (SDG 7 with 39% of companies contributing to this SDG), good health and well-being (SDG 3 – 25%), and climate action (SDG 13 – 16%), overlooking others like biodiversity (SDGs 14 and 15), quality education (SDG 4), and gender equality (SDG 5) despite them being some of the most pressing global risks at the moment. Of note, SDGs 2, 6, 11, 3, 1 are the most neglected goals

With the spotlight on SDGs 3, 7 and 13, one may assume they are deeply integrated within companies’ models and drive substantial revenues. But the study’s analysis demonstrated otherwise. On average, companies contribute 24% of their total revenues to SDG 7. While this may seem promising, with rising energy prices, and declining financial support for clean energy in low- and middle-income nations, the achievement of SDG 7 still seems out of reach. Are companies effectively targeting the right stakeholders, and directing their SDG-related products and services where the achievement gap is most pronounced?

To understand corporate commitments to the SDGs, the study examined both their positive and negative contributions which revealed that almost two-thirds of companies in the STOXX 600 are not effectively mitigating their material negative contributions. This demonstrates that companies still have a lot to do in terms of acknowledgment of their negative contributions and accountability toward stakeholders.

So what have they concluded? The report makes it clear: “The STOXX 600, despite leading in sustainability disclosures, and benefiting from regulations like the EU Taxonomy and Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), appears unable to contribute significantly to achieving the 2030 Agenda.

Moreover, transparency and reporting are vital but useless without relevant and effective positive contributions and negative contribution mitigations. “Despite burgeoning regulations on ESG disclosures, our research indicates there is still a lack of transparency around target-setting and measurement of sustainability performance,” explains Bitoune. What’s more, she added, their data shows profit-seeking still overwhelmingly drives business behavior. “Most companies are not effectively embedding purpose into their business models or mitigating negative externalities.”

To read the full story and learn more, click here

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This